Valor pronóstico del ratio nodal en el cáncer gástrico: análisis unicéntrico de 199 pacientes / Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: Unicentric analysis pf 199 patients

IntroducciónEl sistema de clasificación ganglionar más utilizado en el cáncer gástrico es el TNM. No obstante presenta limitaciones, como la «migración de estadificación» en los casos con linfadenectomías subóptimas, por ello se han planteado distintos sistemas. Asimismo, el objetivo fue valorar la influencia del ratio nodal medido en terciles [RNt] como factor pronóstico, y compararlo con los sistemas TNM (7.ª ed.) y log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].Material y métodosSe trata de un estudio retrospectivo y unicéntrico sobre 199 pacientes con neoplasia gástrica intervenidos con intención curativa entre 2010 y 2014. Se realizó un análisis univariante y multivariante de cada sistema, y se compararon las tasas de supervivencia global [SG] obtenidas mediante test ROC.ResultadosLos factores pronóstico que mostraron significación estadística en el análisis multivariante fueron: RNt2 (HR 2,87) y RNt3 (HR 7,29); LODDS 2 (HR 1,55), LODDS3 (HR 2,6) y LODDS4 (HR 4,9); pN2 (HR 1,84) y pN3 (HR 2,91). La SG a 5 años fue del 75,8, 61,4, 25,8 y 3,84% para RNt0, RNt1, RNt2 y RNt3; 72,4, 60, 29,1 y 13,9% para LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 y LODDS4; y 77,6, 59,4, 28,8 y 25,5% para pN0, pN1, pN2 y pN3, respectivamente. Los 3 sistemas se comportaron como buenos predictores, con áreas bajo la curva >0,75.ConclusiónEl RNt fue un factor pronóstico independiente para la estimación de la supervivencia en el cáncer gástrico. Además, la facilidad de su cálculo en la práctica clínica podría disminuir el efecto de migración de estadificación (AU)

IntroductionIn the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].Material and methodsRetrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test.ResultsThe prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tNR2 (HR 2.87) and tNR 3 (HR 7.29); LODDS 2 (HR 1.55), LODDS3 (HR 2.6) and LODDS4 (HR 4.9); pN2 (HR 1.84) and pN3 (HR 2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8, 61.4, 25.8 and 3.84% for tNR0, tNR1, tNR2 and tNR3; 72.4, 60, 29.1 and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6, 59.4, 28.8 and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75.ConclusiontNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration (AU)

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: unicentric analysis of 199 patients.

INTRODUCTION: In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS]. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test. RESULTS: The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tRN2 (HR2.87) and tRN3 (HR7.29); LODDS 2 (HR1.55), LODDS3 (HR2.6) and LODDS4 (HR4.9); pN2 (HR1.84) and pN3 (HR2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8%, 61.4%, 25.8%, and 3.84% for tRN0, tRN1, tRN2 and tRN3; 72.4%, 60%, 29.1% and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6%, 59.4%, 28.8% and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75. CONCLUSION: tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: Unicentric analysis pf 199 patients. / Valor pronóstico del ratio nodal en el cáncer gástrico: análisis unicéntrico de 199 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS]. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test. RESULTS: The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tNR2 (HR 2.87) and tNR 3 (HR 7.29); LODDS 2 (HR 1.55), LODDS3 (HR 2.6) and LODDS4 (HR 4.9); pN2 (HR 1.84) and pN3 (HR 2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8, 61.4, 25.8 and 3.84% for tNR0, tNR1, tNR2 and tNR3; 72.4, 60, 29.1 and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6, 59.4, 28.8 and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75. CONCLUSION: tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

Recidiva parietal de colangiocarcinoma hiliar. ¿Es el drenaje biliar transparietohepático el de elección en los pacientes con colangiocarcinoma hiliar? / Parietal recurrence of hiliar cholangiocarcinoma: Is percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage the best choice in patients with hiliar cholangiocarcinoma?

No disponible

Hernia de Bochdalek con contenido de riñón izquierdo intratorácico / Left Bochdalek Hernia Containing Intrathoracic Kidney

No disponible

Hidronefrosis derecha por fecaloma / Right hydronephrosis secondary to fecal impaction

No disponible

Artefacto radioopaco en un segmento hepático / Radiopaque artifact in a liver segment

No disponible